no need for name calling sir, you seem equally adamant about your position on dynamic linked libraries and the GPL, but you've yet to back it up with the relevant text from the license which indicates it. I've been searching for a while now and I can't find any reference in the GPL v2 or v3 that makes any such claims about dynamically linked libraries. the closest thing to an official word on the subject is in gnu's faq which says the exact opposite. Yes it is a grey area. you are absolutely no more correct than anyone else until you cite the exact text from the GPL which agrees with the point you've been claiming.