Solved Check if player is standing on block clicked

So how would I do that?

Here's a snippet of my code:

Code:

    @EventHandler
    public void onPlayerInteract(PlayerInteractEvent e) {
        final Player p = e.getPlayer();
 
        if(!(e.getAction() == Action.RIGHT_CLICK_BLOCK)){
            return;
        }
 
        if(!e.getPlayer().isSneaking()){
            return;
        }
        final Block clicked = e.getClickedBlock();
 
        if(p.getLocation() == clicked.getLocation().add(0, 1, 0)){ //I have tried also removing the .add
            p.setVelocity(p.getLocation().getDirection() //This is what doesn't work.
                    .multiply(1).setY(1));
            p.sendMessage("Location detected");
            }
        

Also before anyone ask I have registered my evens. Everything works except the location finding. Thank you for the help ^^

 

== in java checks for reference equality, not value equality. .equals() will check for value equality which is what you need here.

 

It still doesn't seem to work :c..

Code:java

        if(p.getLocation().equals(clicked.getLocation().add(0, 1, 0))){
            p.setVelocity(p.getLocation().getDirection()
                    .multiply(1).setY(1));
            p.sendMessage("Location detected");
            }

 

Have you just tried printing out the locations and see why they're not equal? Then you can probably fix it yourself when you saw the difference

 

I'll try that. Thanks!

Thank you. I figured it out. The reason it wasn't working was cause the player location found a double and the clicked location found an int. Here's what I did if anyone else also needs it:

Code:

Location clickLoc = clicked.getLocation().add(0, 1, 0);
        Location playerLoc = new Location(p.getWorld(), p.getLocation().getBlockX(), p.getLocation().getBlockY(), p.getLocation().getBlockZ());
        if(playerLoc.equals(clickLoc)){
            p.setVelocity(p.getLocation().getDirection()
                    .multiply(1).setY(1));
            p.sendMessage("Location detected");
            }

 

Oh thing, that issue again. You might as well just check the x, y and z coordinates yourself so you wouldn't need to create a new location.

 

Yea. I'll do that. What do you mean by that issue again? Has many people been tricked by that? xP

 

khave No, it always tricks me, because I would expect that a location with exact coordinates would still match a location with only block coordinates, if they would describe the same block.

 

Yea it is a bit weird and quite annoying, but now I know, so I won't make the same mistake.