And that's really the only thing I've wanted to see. With all the people bouncing around stating that this rule has always been enforced with such rigor, a simple admittance that there was a period where it was neglected is a fresh breath of air. Most people weren't so much against the topic, as they were against the sudden change in how strongly you guys enforce your position on it. That was my stance on it, at least. This is all we need (in my opinion) to explain it. I just wanted an actual response where the staff owned up to their actions, instead of pretending that they had been enforcing it this strongly all along. It's just a matter of being straight-forward with the community, to some extent. Thank you.